Falco Fateburn wrote:
You were comparing legal girls that look like a child to Rachel, when it isn't the same situation at all.
We can't speak about Rachel like that because her situation can't be compared realistically. What you said is true however, age wise, they are legal but appearance wise they look like a child. But that is irrelevant since she is already legal, so she can even look like 10 or something. In reality though, Rachel is probably 1000 years old vampire wise, but in the "regular" world, she is only 12 years old (I don't know her exact age, but I am assuming it is something like this) and that, is inappropriate.
I don't get how a 24 year old that looks like a 12 year old is different than a 120(?) year old that looks like a 12 year old.
Are you saying that if Rachel was 20ish in the canon but looked 12 the public would have the same reaction?
Because REALISTICALLY, she is 12 YEARS OLD. I am 18 years old, I could be 5 years old on Marsian standards. I could be 50 on Saturn standards.
Nobody cares about it. In the "real" world, she's underaged. That's why I said it's impossible to talk about it, since there is no such thing as super natural beings that age slower in their "race".
And besides, this is all theory talk. Even if it would be legal, it's still going to give bad looks because it is obviously fanservice for lolicons. Hide that with some dumb story like vampires and Mori is set.
Also those people that look underaged even though they are legal, STILL bring lots of attention on them and bad looks on people because appearance wise, they don't look old enough for a serious relationship with a grown man. It's legal yes, but doesn't mean people DON'T look at it in the wrong way.
To answer your question, yes it would. Only that way, people couldn't say anything against it because, law wise, they are legal and are allowed to have a relationship like that. It would still give bad looks, but nobody could say anything against it.