Can someone explain to me...

Nizama · **Posted:** Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:11 pm

Oh, the decisions of life. So hard to choose is it right or not.

swordiris · **Posted:** Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:11 pm

Falco Fateburn wrote:

Except Rachel does not even look close to an adult.

The only thing that comes close to her acting like an adult is her way of talking.

Did you ever see the "bait" on "To catch a predator".

They look like kids right?

They are actually over 18 because it is illegal to use children as Bait. So legally someone could date him. Some of them do look 12.

LuckyTouhouStar · **Posted:** Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:14 pm

ahhhhh memories of Tera forum arguments for Elin <3

Falco Fateburn · **Posted:** Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:20 pm

You were comparing legal girls that look like a child to Rachel, when it isn't the same situation at all.

We can't speak about Rachel like that because her situation can't be compared realistically. What you said is true however, age wise, they are legal but appearance wise they look like a child. But that is irrelevant since she is already legal, so she can even look like 10 or something. In reality though, Rachel is probably 1000 years old vampire wise, but in the "regular" world, she is only 12 years old (I don't know her exact age, but I am assuming it is something like this) and that, is inappropriate.

swordiris · **Posted:** Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:20 pm

Falco Fateburn wrote:

You were comparing legal girls that look like a child to Rachel, when it isn't the same situation at all.

We can't speak about Rachel like that because her situation can't be compared realistically. What you said is true however, age wise, they are legal but appearance wise they look like a child. But that is irrelevant since she is already legal, so she can even look like 10 or something. In reality though, Rachel is probably 1000 years old vampire wise, but in the "regular" world, she is only 12 years old (I don't know her exact age, but I am assuming it is something like this) and that, is inappropriate.

I don't get how a 24 year old that looks like a 12 year old is different than a 120(?) year old that looks like a 12 year old.

Are you saying that if Rachel was 20ish in the canon but looked 12 the public would have the same reaction?

Noxus418 · **Posted:** Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:49 am

swordiris wrote:

I don't get how a 24 year old that looks like a 12 year old is different than a 120(?) year old that looks like a 12 year old.

It isn't (Well maybe the 120 year old is a bit too old for me :lol:

). The problem is not whether they are legal or not. The thing is when a random on-looker sees you play a game in which they see a little girl kissing a man. Unless they are open minded, they are not going to care whether the girl is a vampire or whatever shenanigans. All they are going to complain about is how they saw a 12 year old kissing a man. Course Aksys could go explain it, but considering the retarded ratings board we have they are probably going to not listen.

Falco Fateburn · **Posted:** Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:59 am

swordiris wrote:

Falco Fateburn wrote:

You were comparing legal girls that look like a child to Rachel, when it isn't the same situation at all.

We can't speak about Rachel like that because her situation can't be compared realistically. What you said is true however, age wise, they are legal but appearance wise they look like a child. But that is irrelevant since she is already legal, so she can even look like 10 or something. In reality though, Rachel is probably 1000 years old vampire wise, but in the "regular" world, she is only 12 years old (I don't know her exact age, but I am assuming it is something like this) and that, is inappropriate.

I don't get how a 24 year old that looks like a 12 year old is different than a 120(?) year old that looks like a 12 year old.

Are you saying that if Rachel was 20ish in the canon but looked 12 the public would have the same reaction?

Because REALISTICALLY, she is 12 YEARS OLD. I am 18 years old, I could be 5 years old on Marsian standards. I could be 50 on Saturn standards.

Nobody cares about it. In the "real" world, she's underaged. That's why I said it's impossible to talk about it, since there is no such thing as super natural beings that age slower in their "race".

And besides, this is all theory talk. Even if it would be legal, it's still going to give bad looks because it is obviously fanservice for lolicons. Hide that with some dumb story like vampires and Mori is set.

Also those people that look underaged even though they are legal, STILL bring lots of attention on them and bad looks on people because appearance wise, they don't look old enough for a serious relationship with a grown man. It's legal yes, but doesn't mean people DON'T look at it in the wrong way.

To answer your question, yes it would. Only that way, people couldn't say anything against it because, law wise, they are legal and are allowed to have a relationship like that. It would still give bad looks, but nobody could say anything against it.

Shiro · **Posted:** Fri Mar 30, 2012 7:02 am

It was great to read about NoelxRagna and then boom Rachels loli talk begins, btw at first i was like there isnt nothing wrong with RachelxRagna (i think if any1 is gonna pair with Ragna its her, when i saw Rachels gag ending i was even more sure..) but after reading and reading i agree with Falco so much.

cg40k · **Posted:** Sun Apr 01, 2012 4:10 pm

I got to say Im a bigger fan of RachelXRagna than NoelXRagna.

Strider · **Posted:** Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:25 pm

Have to agree with Falco. Though I'm sure they never intended to actually show a relationship like that in the series, it's probably up to the player to make up their own ideas of what happens in that regard.

I don't see anything happening unless they make the game 18+
Disappointment but true...

Can someone explain to me...

Who is online