An apology, of sorts.

Rainbow · **Joined:** Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:19 pm **Posts:** 797

Stop it Geno, I am starting to feel embarrased about all this :oops:

.

Geno · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:19 pm **Posts:** 166

Haha, all of this happened before you joined If I'm correct.

:)

Shadow Draygon · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:53 am **Posts:** 1490

No one is willing to admit that they didn't care at the time nor cared about it now.

Geno · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:19 pm **Posts:** 166

Shadow Draygon wrote:

No one is willing to admit that they didn't care at the time nor cared about it now.

They see you trollin', dey hatin'

Overlord Almaz · **Posted:** Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:26 pm

Who is this person woh has the Pimp-Carl in his avy?

And what exactly happened that he's apologising for?

Sorry if this has already been answered. I don't read previous pages, I'm lazy.

Takoto · **Posted:** Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:27 pm

Shadow Draygon wrote:

No one is willing to admit that they didn't care at the time nor cared about it now.

I just didn't notice at the time, tbh.

Shadow Draygon · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:53 am **Posts:** 1490

Oh Takoto, you're one of the few people here I can get a straight answer from.

Geno · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:19 pm **Posts:** 166

Overlord Almaz wrote:

Who is this person woh has the Pimp-Carl in his avy?

And what exactly happened that he's apologising for?

Sorry if this has already been answered. I don't read previous pages, I'm lazy.

Back in, iunno, like September I ran into scuffles with quite a few members of this website. I just stopped by to apologize to the community.

@Shadow
What's the point of even coming in here if you're going to intentionally desecrate a pure apology? I would assume that falls under 'trolling', which indeed breaks a rule of the section.

Shadow Draygon · **Joined:** Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:53 am **Posts:** 1490

Geno wrote:

@Shadow
What's the point of even coming in here if you're going to intentionally desecrate a pure apology? I would assume that falls under 'trolling', which indeed breaks a rule of the section.

Geno · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:19 pm **Posts:** 166

You "joke" with little to no undertone. Excuse me for not knowing you in the slightest. I think you should study up on text-to-emotion practices, because clearly your brain can't handle the process behind it. It truly raddled me that you would attempt to derail a topic so innocent. Don't you have better things to do with your life?

I apologize if I sound insincere, but that is truly one of the most rude things ever.

An apology, of sorts.

Who is online